tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36816678.post3221377324847597013..comments2023-10-31T23:04:26.342+11:00Comments on palmerweb.blog: Dojo without JavaScript EnabledTony Palmerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04902447052244842113noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36816678.post-67643325260514536462008-09-04T09:07:00.000+10:002008-09-04T09:07:00.000+10:00The short answer is no. The form contained about 3...The short answer is no. The form contained about 30 fields, of which only around half would need to be answered (hence the JS), so developing a form without JS would take a fair about of time. Also this would only effect a very low number of users, like 2 out of about 300 - so not really necessary. If the form was simple or I expected a large number of users that needed this then it would probably be a higher priority. I'm a pragmatist, aiming for accessibility is a good ideal, but for this case it was more important to let the user know that there is something wrong and to call us - so that we can resolve. Your situation, priorities and requirements might be different and so you might be able to have accessibility has a more important priority.Tony Palmerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04902447052244842113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36816678.post-51066247491925328562008-09-04T01:22:00.000+10:002008-09-04T01:22:00.000+10:00I was in a design accessibility class last week. I...I was in a design accessibility class last week. In it the instructor asserted that if the purpose of a page can't be met without JavaScript turned on, then it's not accessible!<BR/><BR/>So I can see from your post a clue as to how to implement this, but I'm wondering. Do you make all your web apps workable without Javascript?Timothy Brileyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18288401161165456683noreply@blogger.com